2014年8月10日星期日

We tested Secret's anti-bullying technique... And it unsuccessful

We tested Secret's anti-bullying technique... And it unsuccessful

Shadowy messaging app Secret has been under fire almost since the daytime it launched, with a number of critics in disagreement with the purpose of it enables cyber-bullying. Company head of the company David Byttow responded earlier this week with a means pillar concerning how Secret is working tricky to curtail such abusive behavior via a the people flagging technique and a team of real-life pillar moderators. Plus an algorithm with the purpose of uses “keywords and patterns” to flag posts with the purpose of could violate Secret’s guidelines.

So we unfaltering to plunk Byttow’s technique to the test.

Yesteryear next to 1:30pm ET, I posted the following message to Secret:

Sophie R slept with Mr Jacobs in imitation of graduation. I’m certainly Jared doesn’t know. Slut!
Several of my destiny colleagues favorited the pillar, and contributed their own downbeat explanation concerning “Sophie R.” solitary colleague and flagged the pillar on behalf of hounding, approximately solitary hour in imitation of it paramount appeared. The pillar the minute disappeared from her app torrent, although it remained here one and all else’s torrent (and online via its undying URL).

The pillar remained involved stay fresh night, so I emailed a Secret presenter on behalf of other in sequence on the company’s inner principles on behalf of response instance to flagged posts (without disclosing our test). I and wanted to know how many human being moderators the company — which recently raised $25 million here in mint condition venture center funding — employs.

The presenter replied with the purpose of moderation is a “major area of investment and focus on behalf of our company… we are ramping up our moderation team continuously, and all week we roll prohibited moderation platform enhancements with the purpose of allow us to react sooner and smarter to the arrival of in mint condition content being posted.” in the function of on behalf of response epoch, she wrote: “We don’t share our principles publicly, but we’re for eternity working on getting sooner, and of module the team factory on priority flags with privileged urgency, a unsurpassed practice from other social sites.”

What time I woke up this morning, the pillar was still in attendance. It and had been commented on by a pair of non-Fortune employees who the majority certainly get something done not know “Sophie R.” Apparently they were Secret users who a minute ago wanted to amass on.

The pillar remained involved on behalf of 24 hours. It follows that we informed Secret of the spot via an email to its presenter, and it almost the minute disappeared. We and acknowledged the following email from head of the company David Byttow:

The pillar you referenced was detected by our automated technique, but not fully taken down fast sufficient. In attendance are several proprietary factors next to cooperate now too (e.G. Location of pillar, reputation of author, etc) with the purpose of are taken into credit. Here piece of information, we prioritize high ranking schools in detail based on location and set-up.
On the other hand, this pillar be supposed to be there taken down based on content (and was) in the function of it’s a fair violation of our guidelines.
In the function of far in the function of drive too fast is concerned, we’ve qualified our a gigantic spike here growth (10-20x) here Brazil and Israel. Our team is scaling up across the board to deal in it.
I and had a preparation phone conversation with Byttow, who held with the purpose of he might not discuss one details of the company’s “proprietary” moderation technique before current response epoch (although he did say with the purpose of the eventual goal was to pull off near-instant responses). He added via a succeeding email with the purpose of Secret had “found a moderation bug here this specialized assignment and are chasing it down… determination be there fixed now.”

Observably, this all is exceedingly worrying. We posted a message with the purpose of was, by all objective accounts, an illustration of cyber-bullying. Were Sophie a real person using Secret, odds are with the purpose of she would suffer seen it contained by 24 hours — agreed how it circulated between her “friends.” And Byttow isn’t claiming with the purpose of Secret realized we were gaming the technique. As an alternative, he acknowledged with the purpose of the technique unsuccessful. Moreover, the person who flagged the pillar had all intention to believe it had been unconcerned, since it disappeared from her torrent.

Secret needs to get something done better. And fast. Perhaps in the function of fast in the function of it’s growing.


没有评论:

发表评论