Source by http://www.Laptop-akku-shop.De/ : The retired IBM executive who led the Apple-Samsung jury debate understood near was rebuff single witness or else slice of evidence with the aim of led to the panel’s decision to reward Apple $119.6 million in the sphere of indemnity.
“It’s the collection of everything we were exposed to the same as evidence in the sphere of the commission,” foreman Thomas Dunham understood on Monday, speaking outside the courtroom in the sphere of San Jose.
Dunham understood the biggest revelation of the trial was probably with the aim of Google had agreed to indemnify Samsung on by smallest amount a connect of the patents by send out in the sphere of the commission.
“I think it woke us all up,” Dunham understood. However, he and other jurors understood with the aim of Google’s role was not a thing in the sphere of the decision on infringement or else the amount of indemnity ultimately awarded.
“Not by all,” Dunham understood.
One more juror, Pamela Sage, agreed.
“It was fascinating, but it didn’t substitute several of our opinion,” Sage understood. “It didn’t substitute our decision-making in the sphere of several way.”
The same as to how it single-minded the amount of indemnity, Dunham understood the jury wasn’t looking to throw a message, but relatively simply to reward reasonable indemnity.
“The indemnity were based on the piece of evidence with the aim of both sides presented their deem of what did you say? A reasonable amount of, I speculate, compensation would subsist,” he understood. “We didn’t really feel either lone was what did you say? We felt was a flaxen and simply compensation.”
In the sphere of the launch, approximately jurors had privileged wound awards in the sphere of mind and approximately junior, understood juror Margarita Palmada, who declined to say what did you say? Folks amounts were.
“At the launch we ongoing with several amounts, but with the aim of was part of the process,” Palmada understood.
The same as on behalf of the misinterpret with the aim of sent the jury back on behalf of an added two hours of debate, Dunham called with the aim of a “clerical error” with the aim of involved putting the immoral amount into a connect of the boxes.
Dunham, who has worked restoring classic British cars since retiring from IBM, understood he is allowing for seemly a consultant on behalf of patent issues agreed his experience, initially by IBM and at this moment in the sphere of the jury space.
“I kind of feel like I won the lotto,” Dunham understood.
He understood he did chance with the aim of the parties might catch a way to settle their disputes, adage with the aim of consumers are the ultimate losers in the sphere of patent battles the same as the engineers with the aim of create products are enforced to splurge moment with lawyers.
“It takes a assortment dazed of your development team,” he understood. “When you are pulling your key in pole dazed, they are not liability the things they are aimed to subsist liability and ultimately with the aim of reflects in the sphere of what did you say? We catch sight of the same as consumers on the shelves. … So yeah, I’d like to catch sight of them catch a way to settle, but we’ll catch sight of. I chance with the aim of this in the sphere of approximately way helps smooth with the aim of expectations.”
Dunham and Sage understood they and the other jurors worked well the same as a team and with the aim of all part brought a unique perspective.
“We all brought something several with the aim of we heard in the sphere of the testimony,” Sage understood. “We simply wanted to achieve a flaxen decision. I think the same as a team we worked very well as one. We all respected all other.”
Dunham understood with the aim of the jury went in excess of all the evidence and used the phones and medicine with the aim of were made obtainable the same as exhibits.
“We went through them all,” he understood. “It was a rigorous week. We missing rebuff throw stones at unturned — made a assortment of individuals pass the time, I think, but as you are chatting in relation to with the aim of kind of money and with the aim of kind of bang [you] require to execute a very thorough appointment,” he understood.
Dunham acknowledged he had the the largest part experience of the patent practice.
“I simply happened to subsist a ringer,” Dunham understood with a laugh.
没有评论:
发表评论